CricketThe Super Over that wasn’t to be
Post image

Sri Lanka and India End First ODI in Controversial Tie

In a surprising turn of events, the first One Day International (ODI) between India and Sri Lanka ended in a tie, sparking controversy over the lack of a Super Over to determine a winner.

Umpires Fail to Enforce ICC Playing Conditions

Despite the ICC playing conditions for ODIs clearly stating that a Super Over should be played in the event of a tie, the on-field umpires, Joel Wilson and Raveendra Wimalasiri, decided against it, leaving the match with no winner.

The ICC’s current playing conditions for ODIs specify that if teams’ scores are equal after both innings, a Super Over should be played. If the Super Over also ends in a tie, subsequent Super Overs should be played until a winner is determined.

Controversy Surrounds the Decision

While the ICC has declined to comment on bilateral matters, the Indian team spokesperson has yet to respond to the controversial decision made by the umpires.

This tied match marks the first out of 149 ODIs played at Colombo RPS. Hosts Sri Lanka currently lead the series after their victory in the second ODI, putting India in a position to level the series in the final match.

India’s hopes to level the series have been challenged by their loss, ending their winning streak of 11 consecutive bilateral series (2 matches) against Sri Lanka.